Heason Technology
Advances in technology and design pushes trend towards Electro-Mechanical Actuators

Advances in technology and design pushes trend towards Electro-Mechanical Actuators

Over the last few years, the demand from end users to increase the use of electro-mechanical actuators, whilst reducing the use of pneumatic actuation in factory automation equipment, has increased significantly.

There are several factors which are driving this conversion, but the most significant is the increasing requirement to achieve the following objectives:

Once the decision to replace pneumatic actuators with electro-mechanical actuators has been made, the next step is to choose the right electro-mechanical actuator. While fundamental thrust specifications may be similar, there are significant differences in the areas of lifecycle performance, maintainability and environmental resistance.

Lifecycle performance

The larger the diameter of the ball screw, the greater the thrust potential, however, achieving this requires proper coupling of the thrust bearing and all fixation points, including the:

Otherwise, any increase in thrust would come at the expense of system life. A component that is too weak to handle its load will wear out much faster or even become damaged. Given two electro-mechanical actuators, each fitted with a 16 mm ball screw and providing 750 Newtons of thrust, for example, one may have travel life of 2000km, while another could provide 8000km of travel. The difference is in how well the ball screw is coupled to the other components and then to each other.

Moreover, due to larger ball screw diameters correlating also with cost and footprint, properly coupling the ball screw and other components can reduce both. To meet an application requirement of 3200N of force, one vendor might utilise a ball screw with 20 mm diameter, while another vendor with properly mated components, might achieve the same thrust with a screw of only 12 mm diameter, thus being able to downsize without sacrificing performance.

Proper coupling of ball screws and other components has the greatest impact on the life of the actuator, and this together with the carrier design has the greatest impact on precision and load capacity. One of the carrier’s main functions is to reduce free play in radial and lateral directions. Factors impacting this are the diameter of the carrier body, the contact surface area and the use of support legs.

A larger carrier body, (Fig. 1) can support larger external radial loads, by maximising surface contact area in a side load situation.

The ability to side load electric actuators would raise performance, precision and compactness to a level that is not attainable with pneumatic or hydraulic actuation.

Likewise, increased contact area in a pure thrust situation reduces play, providing support for lateral loads on the extension tube (Fig. 2).

While maximising surface areas impacts radial and lateral load capacity; it does not necessarily impact stability. This is often addressed by interlocking elevated legs into grooved channels (③). These support legs also help reduce vibration, which can add noise and contribute to wear. Most designs use one or two such ridges, which remove some play but can generate clicking sounds as the system begins to wear over time. Using four legs instead of two, however, reduces wear and noise, providing more effective and more durable anti-rotational protection. The additional legs will also help ensure cling-free return motion, further reducing the amount of play in the system due to wear.

Additionally, curving these carrier legs outwards creates radial preload, which reduces play in the thrust tube and centers the carrier body and ball nut, eliminating the need to shim the carrier to the extrusion and compensating for wear over the life of the device. Keeping everything in alignment also reduces the frequency with which the system must be calibrated to achieve consistent idle torque.

While close tolerances are critical for wear and noise reduction, if there is no air gap at all, pressure can build when the actuator is running at high speed. This can cause overheating, contributing to lubrication problems and other durability issues. Thomson addressed this by making two of the male key features on the carrier legs lower than the remaining two. This provided just enough of gap to prevent pressure build-up. As seen in fig 1 two of the male key features on the carrier legs that is orthogonally situated are lower than the remaining two. This is what prevents the pressure build-up.

Maintainability

Ease of maintenance certainly affects lifecycle performance of an electro-mechanical actuator and contributes to immediate productivity benefits. Electro-mechanical actuators differ in their lubrication and motor handling. Most systems retract to expose parts for lubrication only partially, maybe 60 or 70 percent. Technicians remove the caps, locate the parts that need lubrication, add grease, and may need to repeat the process. A better approach, however, is to extend or retract the tube completely, revealing all components for maximum coverage. These few steps allow implementation of automated lubrication systems. In addition, using a lubrication nipple that eliminates the need to remove the cap simplifies maintainability.

PC series parallel solution Another key factor is installation time that is consumed in mating up the motor with the mechanical actuator. Traditionally mounting the motor in a parallel configuration can take 20-25 minutes. Once the motor is being mounted, a technician must use a variety of tools to adjust it for proper belt tension and aligning. This requires at least 12 steps. But if the actuator design comes with a pre-assembled parallel solution, the belt can be pre-tensioned during assembly, eliminating the need for the multistep tension adjustments, and enabling the motor to be bolted down and usable in only three steps. For inline mounting, the benefits of a pre-assembled solution are similar, although not as dramatic, reducing the number of steps from 7 to 3.

Additionally, the use of a straddle-mount bearing strategy eliminates the risk of misalignment. Besides, it protects the motor shaft from impact by radial loads, which also reduces noise and further extends system life.

Environmental resistance

A very important point in which electro-mechanical actuators differ from each other is their ability to resist against harsh or environmental conditions and withstand frequent high-pressure wash downs. This is basically a matter of the exterior profile design, material choice and sealing strategy.

Compared with grooved surfaces, an exterior profile with a smooth surface is cleaner, because it avoids accumulation of dust and fluids in grooves. This makes it more appropriate for harsh environments when frequent wash down is required. There could be one downside of a sleek exterior, though. If used in applications which require a sensor attachment, an additional plastic add-on might be necessary to attach the sensor.

Environmental resistance also depends on the material composition of the extension tube. Most systems use chrome steel, but stainless steel is a much better choice for harsh environments.

A key indicator of resistance to solids and liquids in the environment is the Ingress Protection (IP) Code of the National Electrical Manufacturer Association (NEMA) (Table 1). Achieving an IP rating of 65, for example, means that the system is completely dustproof and protected against low pressure water jets from any direction, as might be found in a food and beverage industry wash down operation. Only a few electric actuators available today meet this, but in corrosive environments it is critical. An IP rating of 54 provides some degree of dust protection and protection against splashed water, making it acceptable for some wash down applications but not if pressure is involved. An IP rating of 40, which is quite common among linear actuators, implies that there is no dust or liquid protection.

 Ingress Protection (IP) Code of the National Electrical Manufacturer Association (NEMA) (Table 1).

 

First Digit: Ingress of solid objects

Second Digit: Ingress of liquids

0

No protection

No Protection

1

Protected against solid objects over 50mm in diameter e.g. hands, large tools

Protected against vertically falling drops of water or condensation

2

Protected against solid objects over 12.5mm e.g. fingers, large tools and similar objects

Protected against falling drops of water, if the case is disposed up to 15 degrees from vertical

3

Protected against solid objects over 2.5mm in diameter e.g. thick wire, small tools

Protected against sprays of water from any direction, even if the case is disposed up to 60 degrees from vertical.

4

Protected against solid objects over 1.0mm in diameter e.g. wires

Protected against low pressure water jets from any direction. Limited ingress permitted.

5

Limited protection against dust ingress (no harmful deposit)

Protected against high pressure water jets from any direction. Limited ingress permitted.

6

Totally protected against ingress

Protected against short periods of immersion in water.

7

N/A

Protected against long, durable periods of immersion in water.

8

N/A

Protected against long, durable periods of immersion in water.

9

N/A

Protected against close-range high pressure, elevated temperature spray down.


A higher IP rating is mainly related to a higher sealing strategy. In this case, every compartment is sealed, including motor mounts. All gaskets should also be sealed and extend all the way back to the motor, instead of stopping at the mounting plate.

Gearing up for the next generation of motion control

As the market drives demand for high productivity solutions, shorter changeover times, increasing reliability and greater energy savings, reduced maintenance and operating costs, more and more designers and end users are migrating to electro-mechanical actuation over pneumatic options. For machinery that requires sophisticated motion control, electro-mechanical actuators are pretty much the only alternative. But even in simpler linear motion applications, motion control designers and users are considering electric actuation based on less and easy maintenance, higher energy savings and cleaner operation.

Even greater benefits can be obtained with careful comparison among assorted brands of electric actuators. Always interpret ‘load carrying capability’ in the context of claimed system life and space requirements. There are very real trade-offs in these areas. Carrier design impacts precision, lateral and rotary load bearing capabilities, so pay close attention to the overall design used to secure the carrier in the channel, as well as to the shape and size of any guidance mechanisms used. Improved mechanisms and parts such as support legs and leg designs, which are curved for better gripping, will have a large positive impact to accuracy and wear. Considering the appropriate exterior profile, material choice and sealing strategy are important key factors for environmental resistance. Smoother profiles, stainless steel materials and higher IP ratings tend to offer the greatest protection.

For more information on electro-mechanical actuators, visit the PC Series section on our website. Alternatively, if you have any questions please call us on +44 (0) 1403 792 300 or email sales@heason.com

This article was originally authored by Thomson Linear.

Date: 14 / 09 / 2018

Share this on social Media

See what is happening at Heason today
Heason Technology Limited
Motion Solutions Centre
Spring Copse Business Park
Slinfold
West Sussex
RH13 0SZ UK

Tel: +44 (0) 1403 792 300
Email: sales@heason.com

Heason Technology
A discoverIE plc company

Subscribe to our Mailing List
Keep up to date with all our latest product news & information.
Subscribe here
Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn

© Copyright Heason Technology Ltd 2018